Greg> def [type2trans] foo(args) [type1trans, type1trans...]: Greg> ... Greg> Greg> or Greg> Greg> def foo [type2trans] (args) [type1trans, type1trans...]: Tim> Hmm - this seems like it has possibilities. Since we could only Tim> have one decorator that returned a descriptor, we could dispense Tim> with the [] on those ... Has anyone considered the side effect of any of these proposals would have on auxiliary tools like syntax-directed editors, other code colorizers, etc? Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4