At 12:54 PM 3/28/04 +0100, Paul Moore wrote: >Robert Mollitor <mollitor at earthlink.net> writes: > > > It would be nice if transformer decorations were never allowed > > "arguments". It would keep that list as short > > and as tidy as possible. > >That's the sort of restriction I imagined that Guido was tending >towards. While it's justifiable in this context, I would prefer to >leave the option of using arguments available, in case someone comes >up with a use where function attributes are inappropriate. It's inappropriate to use attributes of a function for attributes that logically belong to the decorator. For example 'synchronized(lockattr="baz")'. The 'lockattr' logically belongs to the synchronizing decoration. Declaring it in a separate location makes the whole thing harder to read/understand.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4