RetroSearch Browse

Sat Mar 27 15:19:07 EST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/043588.html

On Mar 27, 2004, at 3:10 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:

> On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 12:39, Bernhard Herzog wrote:
>
>> Has somebody suggested the following yet?
>>
>>     def [classmethod] foo(cls, blooh, bla):
>>         pass
>
> Yes, but I'm not sure who <wink>.
>
> Subversive instantly rejected idea of the day: syntactically allow the
> square brackets in any of these three locations:
>
> def [decorator] method [decorator] (args) [decorator]
>
> You'd probably want to disallow more than one [decorator] per 
> definition
> (but maybe not).  Each of these locations is supported by a different
> valid use case, IMO, so why not allow any of them?

Or, of course, the module or class variable:

__metadecorator__ = [decorator]

-bob

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/043588.html below:

[Python-Dev] method decorators (PEP 318)