RetroSearch Browse

Sat Mar 27 15:10:07 EST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/043587.html

On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 12:39, Bernhard Herzog wrote:

> Has somebody suggested the following yet?
> 
>     def [classmethod] foo(cls, blooh, bla):
>         pass

Yes, but I'm not sure who <wink>.

Subversive instantly rejected idea of the day: syntactically allow the
square brackets in any of these three locations:

def [decorator] method [decorator] (args) [decorator]

You'd probably want to disallow more than one [decorator] per definition
(but maybe not).  Each of these locations is supported by a different
valid use case, IMO, so why not allow any of them?

code-consistency-be-damned-ly y'rs,
-Barry

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/043587.html below:

[Python-Dev] method decorators (PEP 318)