RetroSearch Browse

Fri Mar 26 15:51:41 EST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/043562.html

Skip Montanaro wrote:
>     Guido> (For those worried that the function attribute 
> sets appear to
>     Guido> belong to the body, I point to the precedent of 
> the docstring.
>     Guido> IMO the start of the function body is a perfectly 
> fine place for
>     Guido> metadata about a function.)
> 
> The docstring is a bit of a different beast.  They were added 
> before general
> function attributes, right?  As such, they are a partial 
> solution to a more
> general problem.  Had function attributes been available at 
> that time the
> special nature of "if the first object in the 
> module/function/class is a
> string literal, make it the docstring" wouldn't have been 
> (as) necessary.

I can just picture the article:

"Unifying functions and classes in Python 2.5"

Introduction

"Python 2.5 introduces the first phase of "function/class unification".
This is a series of changes to Python intended to remove most of the
differences between functions and classes. Perhaps the most obvious one
is the restriction against declaring attributes of functions (such as
docstrings and other metadata) in a 'def' statement..."

:D

Robert Brewer
MIS
Amor Ministries
fumanchu at amor.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/043562.html below:

[Python-Dev] method decorators (PEP 318)