[Raymond] > In deciding on semantics, we would all rather trade away some power in > exchange for greater clarity about what the expression will do without > having to run it. Put another way, human interpretability is more > important than supporting weird usages. With that criteria, > early-binding is looking to be least nuanced approach. (If I could say my opinion on this,) I agree that human interpretability is more important than supporting weird -or seldomly used- usages, and that early-binding(but without any precomputation) is clearest approach. Furthermore, I think closures should capture variables, too, but it seems that's too much change for now :) Regards, jiwon.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4