At 11:56 AM 3/24/04 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: >Can you reformulate that as an addendum to the PEP? It really needs >good motivation for class decorators. > >--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) Are you sure it should be an addendum, as opposed to just being folded into the PEP's various sections? For example, the 'singleton' example is already in the Examples section, so should it just be addition to motivation? OTOH, I guess I could see putting brief mentions in those sections, and then having an appendix for a detailed explanation of how much harder it is to do decorator-like things with metaclasses. And on the other other hand, maybe citing my email in the Python-dev archive would suffice in place of that appendix. :) Anyway, let me know which way I should go.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4