[Guido]
> I was actually hoping to also get decorators in,
FYI, the 2.4 planning mtg assumed that. I channeled you thusly: "Guido
really wants to get them in, but isn't in love with a syntax yet."
> but I haven't decided on the syntax yet.
Command-line option <wink>.
> It's between before or after the argument list.
Or *is* the argument list. The arguments will be bound to new local name
__args__, which will get magically bound to an instance of a subclass of
collections.deque, for efficient shifting of args off both ends. We need a
subclass to allow efficent access by argument name too.
Argument names will be extracted from optional decorators whose names begin
with "__arg_":
def sum2(staticmethod, __arg_x, __arg_y):
return x+y
# or
return sum(__args__)
# or
return __args__.byname("x") + __args__[-1]
# or
return sum(__args__.pop() for dummy in __args__)
it's-easier-when-you-have-one-to-reject-without-regret-ly y'rs - tim
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4