At 22:54 22.03.2004 -0500, Tim Peters wrote: > > But I always assumed that the toplevel iterable would be different. > >Jiwon's example certainly suggests that it must be. But why <0.7 wink>? (not that this is deep) It seems, it's only one and also expression in the whole thing that can (not that it should) be naturally computed without starting consuming some iterable.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4