Doug Holton wrote: > A. Add a command line switch for the python executable that enables > pychecker. The next time someone complains about some error that the > python compiler didn't catch, just tell them to run "python -strict" or > something to that effect. I hope someone is implementing this. While they are at it, consider adding a "-check" flag to python as well. This would run like normal pychecker does now, but without requiring the extra "stub" executable. On the other hand, perhaps this is "overloading" the python executable too much? I find pychecker invaluable, especially when helping newbies get onto their python legs. My one hope was that pychecker would be able to check code without actually "importing" (aka, executing) the checked file. This would also help running pychecker on scripts that have a "shebang" but no ".py" But I'd rather see it in the standard distribution as-is now, then wait another release to rework it.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4