> > >> > d.forward_months(3).end_of_month() > > >> > > >> In dateutil, I think it's d + relativedelta(months=+1, day=1, days=-1). > > >> Arguably, this is fairly trivial (highly non-obvious, but trivial...) > > > > > > Yes, it'd work, but "d + relativedelta(day=31)" would be enough. > > > > Hmm, I feel vaguely uncomfortable actually relying on the "round down out > > of range values" behaviour. Presumably day=1000 would also work, and would > > look even stranger to me :-) > > This was a design decision, and I confess I'm pretty satisfied > by the results of this decision. This simple decision created > consistent and expectable results for operations which are not > obvious. Why don't you use "d + relativedelta(day=-1)" instead? Just as easy to use, better error detection, and a big precedent. -- Christian Tanzer http://www.c-tanzer.at/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4