> >> > d.forward_months(3).end_of_month() > >> > >> In dateutil, I think it's d + relativedelta(months=+1, day=1, days=-1). > >> Arguably, this is fairly trivial (highly non-obvious, but trivial...) > > > > Yes, it'd work, but "d + relativedelta(day=31)" would be enough. > > Hmm, I feel vaguely uncomfortable actually relying on the "round down out > of range values" behaviour. Presumably day=1000 would also work, and would > look even stranger to me :-) This was a design decision, and I confess I'm pretty satisfied by the results of this decision. This simple decision created consistent and expectable results for operations which are not obvious. Also, without this feature, I see almost no reason for using this class instead of timedelta. -- Gustavo Niemeyer http://niemeyer.net
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4