A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/043132.html below:

[Python-Dev] dateutil

[Python-Dev] dateutilGustavo Niemeyer niemeyer at conectiva.com
Mon Mar 15 10:34:54 EST 2004
> >> >  d.forward_months(3).end_of_month()
> >> 
> >> In dateutil, I think it's d + relativedelta(months=+1, day=1, days=-1).
> >> Arguably, this is fairly trivial (highly non-obvious, but trivial...)
> >
> > Yes, it'd work, but "d + relativedelta(day=31)" would be enough.
> 
> Hmm, I feel vaguely uncomfortable actually relying on the "round down out
> of range values" behaviour. Presumably day=1000 would also work, and would
> look even stranger to me :-)

This was a design decision, and I confess I'm pretty satisfied
by the results of this decision. This simple decision created
consistent and expectable results for operations which are not
obvious. Also, without this feature, I see almost no reason for
using this class instead of timedelta.

-- 
Gustavo Niemeyer
http://niemeyer.net

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4