Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > Yes, it's time for the classical question. ;-) > > What's your opinion about the inclusion of the dateutil[1] > extension in the standard library? > > [1] https://moin.conectiva.com.br/DateUtil In this context, PEP 321 and the discussion about it are relevant: http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0321.html http://groups.google.nl/groups?threadm=ad6u7j09.fsf%40yahoo.co.uk I am in favour of including something like DatuUtil in the standard library. I need it often enough, e.g., to find out out when two weeks after 24 Feb is is easier with DateUtil than with datetime, and I think datetime lacks a strptime. IMO it should be possible to do all date/time arithmetic without the time module; I don't like the time module. My 20 milli-euro's ;-) Gerrit. P.S. "cal 9 1752" would also be nice to have in Python ;-) -- Weather in Twenthe, Netherlands 11/03 12:25 UTC: 5.0°C Few clouds partly cloudy wind 3.6 m/s E (57 m above NAP) -- Asperger's Syndrome - a personal approach: http://people.nl.linux.org/~gerrit/english/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4