RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 3 13:24:23 EST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/042912.html

Armin Rigo wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> In summary, we need to:
> 
> - cache possibly more than one frame per code object;
> - free old frames for code objects that haven't been run for a while.
> 
> At this point I need more thinking.  If someone comes up with an elegant way
> to do both (as opposed, say, to abusing a lot of fields to put PyFrameObject
> structures into two linked lists at the same time), he'd be welcome :-)

What's bad about my proposal?
In short: No frame cache in the code object.
Have a small array of chains of cached frames.
Index this by the address of the code object modulo some
prime which is the array size.

-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware  :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34  home +49 30 802 86 56  mobile +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
      whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/042912.html below:

[Python-Dev] [ python-Patches-876206 ] scary frame speed hacks