On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:24AM +0100, Michael Hudson wrote: > Nevertheless, am I right to still believe that there are no known > distinct strings which even MD5 to the same hash? Correct. One significant reason for the larger SHAs to generate 256-bit keys for AES encryption; it's better to have a larger hash than to take a smaller one and replicate portions of it. But, given that we're not going to include AES in the Python stdlib, people will have to download a separate library anyway. This library could include SHA256, so this application isn't a compelling reason to add SHA256 to the stdlib. It would be different if there were existing protocols that need the larger hash, such as HTTP digest auth; are there any? --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4