Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Barry Warsaw wrote: > >> Good enough reason for me, although my one (minor) concern is the >> consumption of that name in the top-level package namespace for >> something that isn't Python code. > > > Indeed. If you can propose a different location in the source > tree, and in the installed tree (for both Windows and Unix), > I could do that as well. > >> That makes me feel better about dropping it in Lib, even if the use case >> is a little questionable. I'm uncomfortable about having things other >> than packages or modules in that namespace. > > > There are already a lot of lib- directories, which aren't package > names. If a different directory name would make you feel more > comfortable, please suggest one. > > I had precisely the same concerns myself, that's why I asked. msg-catalogs? gettext-mo? Using a '-' in the name is, to me, a pretty clear sign that the thing is not a python package that can be imported... Anthony
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4