David Abrahams wrote:
> I just want to point out that Guido has been basically silent ever
> since this discussion re-started and it has now degenerated into a
> mostly-philosophical debate. I suggest it might be worth waiting for
> him to respond before it spirals any further away from what was asked
> for :)
>
As I said in the original email that re-opened this can of worms:
Guido is undecided on the syntax - he writes "I'm seriously
considering doing it Java-style", but adds that he is totally
swamped for the next two weeks.
I don't think the philosophical arguments about decorators are
particularly useful at this point. It seems very likely that they
will be in 2.4, in a form that Guido decides is least offensive
to his aesthetic judgement.
--
Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au>
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4