Barry Warsaw wrote: > I doubt he will respond. I think Guido has decided what the semantics > will be and is just waffling over what syntax to choose. /I'm/ waiting > for Tim to respond, because he'll get a clear image on his BCR (BDFL > Channel Receptor) a few days before Guido makes up his mind and posts > his pronouncement. I'm now hoping that he goes for the list-before-def approach, since Phillip seems to have shown that it would then be possible to: a) get to use decorators b) write backwards compatible code (albeit with a little magic to do so) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | Brisbane, Australia Email: ncoghlan at email.com | Mobile: +61 409 573 268
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4