On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:10:22PM +0100, Armin Rigo wrote:
> We may consider whether adding, over time, a bunch of modules named shaXXX
> doesn't mean we should start thinking about a way to group all these
> algorithms into a single module.
It would be possible to change the signature of sha.new() to
sha.new('string', bits=256) and have all the variants in one module,
if we want SHA-256 but not a separate module.
--amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4