On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 11:10, Armin Rigo wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:24:17AM -0400, A.M. Kuchling wrote: > > There are a bunch of other variants with different bit sizes such as > > 512, 384, and 224 bits. The only one likely to matter is SHA-512, so > > adding sha256 might mean that down the road we need to add a sha512 > > module, too, but that seems unlikely. +1 > We may consider whether adding, over time, a bunch of modules named shaXXX > doesn't mean we should start thinking about a way to group all these > algorithms into a single module. +1 -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040629/e1f8fea8/attachment.bin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4