Eric Huss wrote: > First, could someone tell me if I took the correct route for creating a > type object on the heap (based on my patch). > > Second, shouldn't there be a more direct API for doing this? Perhaps a > more generalized interface to type_new(), or maybe something completely > new?? I don't understand why the patch needs to be so complicated. Why can't you just make a global function that returns new type objects which are struct seqs? IOW, why do you need the factory type? Type objects are callable themselves, so they act as factories. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4