Martin v. Löwis wrote: > M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > >>> -1. I find it unfortunate that there are encodings which >>> don't convert between Unicode and byte strings; this direction >>> should not be followed. >>> >>> Instead, text processing utilities should be proper libraries. >> >> I don't understand... codecs are not limited to only text >> processing. It's a completely independent framework from the >> Unicode sub-system. > > I know this is viewed, and perhaps even documented, as a > framework independent of Unicode. I think this is a mistake, > and it should have been constrained to character encodings > (i.e. conversions to and from Unicode, using character tables > or similar algorithms) right from the beginning. Ok, noted. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Jun 25 2004) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ IL Workshop @ Net.ObjectDays 2004, Erfurt, Germany 93 days left ::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4