On Jun 24, 2004, at 10:27 AM, Aahz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2004, Raymond Hettinger wrote: >> >> Please do give consideration to putting all of this in a single >> module. IMO, this is too small of an addition to warrant splitting >> everything in to packages (which make it more difficult to understand >> and maintain as a collective unit). > > That's true. However, there has been a regular low-level discussion > about creating a ``text`` package; why not simply name it ``string``? If nothing else, that would cause hell for people who would like to use a backport of the package for Python N, where N is less than the first version that had this feature but still had the string module. -bob -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2357 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040624/baade4fd/smime.bin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4