M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> -1. I find it unfortunate that there are encodings which >> don't convert between Unicode and byte strings; this direction >> should not be followed. >> >> Instead, text processing utilities should be proper libraries. > > > I don't understand... codecs are not limited to only text > processing. It's a completely independent framework from the > Unicode sub-system. I know this is viewed, and perhaps even documented, as a framework independent of Unicode. I think this is a mistake, and it should have been constrained to character encodings (i.e. conversions to and from Unicode, using character tables or similar algorithms) right from the beginning. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4