A few comments > patches you want to see in 2.4 then reads Anthony's announcement email 'reads' => 'read' Suggest delete 'email' since some of us read his announcement as a newgroup post and 'announcement email' does not read very well anyway. > *are* in this alpha with late bindings; if early binding would work > better in your code after trying late binding then speak up since the > semantics can change. This strikes me as an invitation for a very biased sample of opinion. Perhaps people who like and want late binding, after trying it, should also speak up. > Some people said to put it in and if that meant using Guido's, , => syntax, > server under out control was also brought up. Nothing looks like it is out -> our > The list was reminded that in the future at some point, comparisons > between heterogeneous types will raise TypeError sans '==' and '!='. sans == except for? Terry J. Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4