On Sat, Jun 19, 2004, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> [Aahz]
>>Raymond:
>>>
>>> Feedback is requested for two prospective itertools:
>>>
>>> def count_elements(iterable):
>>> b = {}
>>> for elem in iterable:
>>> b[elem] = b.get(elem, 0) + 1
>>> return ((cnt, elem) for elem, cnt in b.iteritems())
>>
>> +1 provided it returns either (elem, cnt) or the dict itself.
>
> Hmm, there seems to be 100% support for returning a dictionary and zero
> support for my iterable (cnt, elem) ... to feed min(), max(), sorted(),
> nlargest(), and nsmallest().
The problem is that it's useful for those operations -- and nothing
else. It's narrow functionality, and anyone looking just at itertools
will find this confusing; it's just not the natural definition for
something named ``count_elements``, and I suspect it is not possible to
create a good name for your purpose. Anyone who understands Python will
expect ``count_elements`` to return (elem,cnt) or a dict.
--
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Typing is cheap. Thinking is expensive." --Roy Smith, c.l.py
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4