RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jun 18 18:12:54 EDT 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-June/045457.html

On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 02:37:38PM -0700, Brett wrote:
> Did an SF bug report ever get filed for this?

Yes. Gustavo endured the bugtracker and it was filed today as bug 975646: 

    http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=975646&group_id=5470&atid=105470

Let us know if any further info is necessary, or if we're barking up the
wrong tree. Thanks.

> On Jun 11, 2004, at 10:58, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> 
> >  Documentation says, regarding tp_getattr:
> >«
> >This field is inherited by subtypes together with tp_getattro: a 
> >subtype
> >inherits both tp_getattr and tp_getattro from its base type when the
> >subtype's tp_getattr and tp_getattro are both NULL.
> >»
> >
> >  Implementation disagrees, at least in cvs head, but the effect of the
> >bug (non-inheritance of tp_getattr) happens in 2.3.3.  Follow with me:
[snip]

Take care,
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-June/045457.html below:

[Python-Dev] tp_(get|set)attro? inheritance bug?