A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-June/045431.html below:

[Python-Dev] Candidate Itertools

[Python-Dev] Candidate Itertools [Python-Dev] Candidate ItertoolsChermside, Michael mchermside at ingdirect.com
Wed Jun 16 14:25:04 EDT 2004
Raymond Hettinger writes:
> Feedback is requested for two prospective itertools:
> 
> def count_elements(iterable):
>     b = {}
>     for elem in iterable:
>         b[elem] = b.get(elem, 0) + 1
>     return ((cnt, elem) for elem, cnt in b.iteritems())

Is the behavior of count_elements() exactly the same as
the given python equivalent when one (or more) of the
elements in the iterable is not hashable?

-- Michael Chermside


This email may contain confidential or privileged information. If you believe you have received the message in error, please notify the sender and delete the message without copying or disclosing it.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4