Eric Huss wrote: > #3 is a little nicer, at the cost of maintaining the counter (which should > be negligible). > > Thoughts? I don't know if that has been considered, yet: in int_dealloc, you don't know what block an int belongs to. Therefore, changing the counter will be difficult. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4