Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Troels Walsted Hansen wrote: > >> Unfortunately I missed the last bug day, and the next one seems to be >> some time off... Perhaps I can convince a Python developer with >> Windows and socket experience to take a look at bug >> http://python.org/sf/777597 and the associated patch >> http://python.org/sf/965036 ? > > I've briefly looked at it, and noticed that the patch should not be > applied. So I suggest you complete the patch, and submit one that > should be applied. You should submit that as a new patch, and close > the one that should not be applied. The patch tracker item contains both a regression test and an updated patch now. I attached both some time ago, I wasn't aware that it was preferable to open a new patch tracking item. Thanks for checking it out. Troels
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4