On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 19:18, Bob Ippolito wrote: > Surely there must be an ISP out there that is Python friendly and would > offer a significant discount.. and is that with or without considering > the typical compression (-z3 is normal, I guess)? Maybe someone like, oh, XS4ALL? <wink>. Last time I talked to Thomas, re moving mail.python.org, he seemed to be totally unconcerned about bandwidth. > I am definitely 100% for Subversion. Update and diff are much faster, > and you can view the repository or do an export with wget if you have > to (assuming Subversion+Apache). Also the efficiency of copying/moving > things around makes life easier, especially for Mac stuff because there > tends to be a lot more directories. We have just recently moved PyObjC > from Sourceforge CVS to a Subversion server and the grass is definitely > greener. +1 on Subversion too, but I still say the biggest problem is finding the cycles to set up and maintain the infrastructure. It was an overwhelming task when we did it ourselves with a fraction of the user and developer community, and I was glad when we moved to SF. If the Gforge installation Andrew was talking about can really be set up and babysat with as little effort as claimed, I think that's worth looking into. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040606/9086cb0c/attachment.bin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4