On Jun 6, 2004, at 1:25 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > A.M. Kuchling wrote: >> The bug day yesterday was a success, despite ending four hours early >> when SourceForge CVS stopped working and didn't come back. (So, are >> we thinking of running our own CVS/SVN/whatever server?) > > I discourage moving away from SF. Our "own" server will have just > as much problems as SourceForge; operating such an infrastructure > should not be taken lightly. I'm not so sure of that. Obviously, many of the problems with SF have to do with the number of projects that they're hosting. One would hope that the load would be a lot less just supporting Python developers. Does anybody have any stats on how many CVS checkouts are done on a daily basis? We could rough up some numbers on how much bandwidth we'd need to support that. -- Nick
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4