[Jeff Epler] ... > Pretending for a moment that it could fly, can we make sure this works > with dicts, and also create +, for tuples and lists? > > I'd like > { 1 +: 3 } > to create the dict {1:4}, and for > 1, 3 +, 5 > to create the tuple (1, 3, 8) As I said last time, I should note that Icon had the good sense to stop there too ... > One last comment -- While you'll have a hard sell with this new syntax > idea, having an implementation for it makes you stand above all the other > people peddling their bad syntax change on the mailing lists. +1. Noam did his homework! I hope he doesn't give up just because Guido wishes he had never been born <wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4