Guido van Rossum wrote: >> Many times I find myself asking for a slice of a specific length, >> rather than a slice with a specific end. I suggest to add the syntax >> object[start:>length] (or object[start:>length:jump]), beside the >> existing syntax. > > Feel free to continue to argue for this, but I'm -1, and that usually > kills a proposal dead. I doubt that you'll be able to get enough > influential people on python-dev to rally for your proposal; but I'm > sure they will explain to you why your syntax is unpythonic and the > feature is so minor as to be unneeded. It already was explained when this came up on c.l.py ... Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4