> This may seem silly, but would it be possible to support both > grammars during the alpha cycle so people get a chance to try it out > (especially those people most likely to use the feature) and weed > one out for the beta? I take it the grammar changes would be only a > small source of bugs, and in any case, dumping one after the alpha > should reduce the bug count. Hm, I can only see downsides to this. Producing the unified patch would be painful, as the code has to deal with both sources of decorators (and what if both are present???). Users would be confused about which syntax to use. Users would be discouraged even more than with one alternative to use the feature except for pure experiments, because they won't know until the beta cycle which syntax will survive. Ripping out one version would be problematic (due to the merging of patches). As I said before, I'll try to discuss this extensively with users at EuroPython. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4