"Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> writes: > John J Lee wrote: > > I remember from a year or so ago that the various PSF licensing agreements > > were not finalised, but Guido said contributors should still sign them in > > their draft form. Have things moved on at all since then? I recall that > > Guido said legal ditherings had been going on for a year or so even back > > then. cookielib is a derived work of libwww-perl, so I guess I need to > > get Gisle Aas (libwww-perl's author) to sign something if it is to be part > > of 2.4, right? > > Most likely, no. Things are still proceeding at a very low pace, and the > papers that have originally been drafted are likely obsolete. > > At the moment, an acknowledgement of the author that he agrees to > distribution of the code together with Python, and under the Python > licensing conditions, is ok. Hi, there. I have no problem with letting cookielib be distibuted under the Python license. Regards, Gisle Aas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4