Armin Rigo <arigo at tunes.org> writes: > The invariants of the ob_xxx list members should be clearly > specified somewhere and we should stick to them. Yes. > E.g. it is unclear to me why we allow list_ass_slice() to reset > ob_item to NULL and ob_size to 0 without resetting ob_allocated to 0 > -- I see why it doesn't crash in a subsequent list_resize(), but it > looks messy. Well, "a mistake" would be my guess <wink>. Cheers, mwh -- You sound surprised. We're talking about a government department here - they have procedures, not intelligence. -- Ben Hutchings, cam.misc
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4