[Tim Peters] > I think I have a fix for this, and will check it in when the tests finish. It's checked in now. > However, it doesn't fail on my box -- MS is *always* moving the memory > around. So I hope that, before someone rebuilds with the checkin, > they temporarily fiddle the test on their box so it fails more often. > I expect that setting the list size to 3 instead of 50 will do that. > If you set it to 1, the test will never fail. Ack, I meant that if you set it to 1, the test will always fail, with or without this patch (__lt__ is never called then, so the list never mutates then).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4