On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:26:21 +0200, Heiko Wundram <heikowu at ceosg.de> wrote: > Hey all! > > Is anybody actively working on PEP 262? I'm currently in the process of > implementing something like it for a package I'm writing, and I'd be glad to > sponsor the code once it's complete. > > I've tried to check out what's in the Python CVS sandbox, but can't get it at > the moment because of network connectivity issues, and the tracker entries on > the bugtracker aren't very helpful either (besides stating that the PEP was > abandoned, and later reopened). > > If there's interest, I'll write up a short text describing what my package can > do in addition to what PEP 262 describes, and how it's integrated with > distutils. I just read the pep, and one thing that jumps at me is that most (linux) distributions already have most of the information; at most a (python) distribution -> package name map is needed; everything else can be done by querying the ldistribution's package database. Of course that is ldistribution-specific, but have you given this any thought? One of the pains of using CPAN on a system that already does package management is that it is usually impossible (or at least very difficult) to keep both in sync; the proposed "package manager installs files" is good, but maybe it can be improved...? -- John Lenton (jlenton at gmail.com) -- Random fortune: bash: fortune: command not found
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4