Martin v. Löwis wrote: > M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > >> I like the idea, but don't think the implementation is >> the right way to do it. Instead, I'd suggest using a new >> error handling strategy "break" ( = break processing as >> soon as errors are found). > > Can you demonstrate this approach in a patch? I think it > is unimplementable: the codec cannot communicate to the > error callback that it ran out of data. We would need a special attribute in the exception for that, but the problem IMHO is a different one. This makes it impossible to use other error handling schemes than "break" in stateful decoders. Bye, Walter Dörwald
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4