M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > I like the idea, but don't think the implementation is > the right way to do it. Instead, I'd suggest using a new > error handling strategy "break" ( = break processing as > soon as errors are found). Can you demonstrate this approach in a patch? I think it is unimplementable: the codec cannot communicate to the error callback that it ran out of data. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4