Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 01:45 PM 7/27/04 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: > >> Barry Warsaw wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 13:25, Tim Peters wrote: >>> >>>> Sure! Jim wants to distinguish "absenceness" from "brokenness" for >>>> some reason. >>> >>> >>> So, why doesn't imp.find_module() fit the bill? >> >> >> It doesn't handle packages. >> >> >>> import compiler.ast >> >>> import imp >> >>> imp.find_module('compiler.ast') >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? >> ImportError: No module named compiler.ast > > > Sure it does; you just have to ask it nicely: :) > > Python 2.2.2 (#37, Oct 14 2002, 17:02:34) [MSC 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 > Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > IDLE 0.8 -- press F1 for help > >>> import imp > >>> imp.find_module('compiler') > (None, 'C:\\PYTHON22\\lib\\compiler', ('', '', 5)) > >>> import compiler > >>> imp.find_module('ast',compiler.__path__) > (<open file 'C:\PYTHON22\lib\compiler\ast.py', mode 'r' at 0x00A99660>, > 'C:\\PYTHON22\\lib\\compiler\\ast.py', ('.py', 'r', 1)) > >>> Right. That's not exactly the API I had in mind though. You could certainly create a usable API on top of find_module. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4