> > My dig was at the Schemers who would rather implement an array as a > > linked list and then optimize tail-recursion in the hope of getting > > some performance back -- in vain because they still can't get O(1) > > indexing. > In all fairness, a serious Schemer would probabliy use the builtin > vector type for an array rather than cons cells. People who insist on using linked lists when they want fast random-access indexing are weird. But my experience is that random-access indexing isn't nearly as useful as people seem to think it is, and that many people use arrays as pure sequences. Not all the time, of course, but often.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4