RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jul 16 02:45:20 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/046244.html

[Christian Tismer]
> How about
> 
>         if ( 0 ||
>               || VISIT(self->readline)
>               || VISIT(self->read)
>               || VISIT(self->file)
>            )
>                return 1;

Well, "0 ||" doesn't do anything at all, it doesn't return the return
value of the visit() callback if a non-zero one is returned, it's
clumsier to write and read than what Jim checked in, and since
Py_VISIT does exactly one thing in exactly one context (tp_traverse
implementations), I have no fear at all of the "hidden" return. 
Almost all tp_traverse implementations can (and should) look exactly
alike:

Py_VISIT(member1);
Py_VISIT(member2);
...
Py_VISIT(member_n);
return 0;

and Py_VISIT has no other use case.  Why complicate it?  Sticking a
"return" in a general purpose macro could be horrid indeed; Py_VISIT
is so specific, and of such limited use, there's simply nothing to
fear here.  It makes writing "correct by casual inspection"
tp_traverse implementations dead easy, and has no effect on anything
else.  A continued +1 for the simplest thing that could possibly work
here (which is happily a 100% solution in this case too).

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/046244.html below:

C API Macro to decref and set to NULL)