> > Guido continues: > > > Another reason is that I don't think it's a good idea to try to > > > encourage a Scheme-ish "solve everything with recursion" programming > > > style in Python. > > > > I wouldn't say that tail recursion *encouraged* a functional style, > > rather I would say that refusing to accept a working version of > > tail recursion actively *discourages* the use of that style. > How about: Tail recursion "enables" recursion-oriented (functional) > style? :) Still -1. I was understating my case: I find the "recursion is the basis of everything" attitude harmful. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4