On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Guido van Rossum wrote: > At the cost of an extra pointer dereference and jump, and usually for > naught (the uses of LOAD_CONST not in a return statement must > certainly vastly outnumber those in return statements). Hm, I didn't think the extra three or so assembler opcodes needed would make that big of an impact on the loop, given all the other things it does. Guess it was a just bad idea :)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4