Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/046199.html below:

[Python-Dev] Pie-thon at OSCON 2004?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Pie-thon at OSCON 2004?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Pie-thon at OSCON 2004?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>   Maybe we should check that
> > 2.4CVS hasn't regressed in performance when compared to 2.3.

Test results on my machine comparing Py2.4a1 vs Py2.3.4:

Parrotbench runs 10% faster on Py2.4a1
PyBench runs 11% faster on Py2.4a1
PyStone runs 6% faster on Py2.4a1
test_decimal.py runs 7% faster on Py2.4a1

My personal apps run 8 to 17% faster on Py2.4a1 without using new
features.

These tests gain 2-4% if profiling of C functions is disabled for an
apples to apples comparison to Py2.3 which doesn't profile C functions.


Raymond

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Pie-thon at OSCON 2004?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Pie-thon at OSCON 2004?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4