RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jul 15 11:10:07 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/046191.html

Greg Ewing <greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz> writes:

> James Y Knight <foom at fuhm.net>:
>
>> On the test that probably puts my change in the most positive light 
>> possible: "x = 0;  while x < 50000000:  x = x + 1", it achieves about a 
>> 50% increase in speed. More normal integer-heavy things seem to be at 
>> most 20% faster.
>
> And you have to ask yourself -- how integer-heavy does
> typical Python code get?
>
> Most Python code I write deals with higher-level things
> most of the time -- strings, lists, dicts, class instances.

It's kinda hard to work seriously with lists and strings without
integers :-) This was, at the very least, a worthwhile experiment...

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  Python enjoys making tradeoffs that drive *someone* crazy <wink>.
                                       -- Tim Peters, comp.lang.python

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/046191.html below:

[Python-Dev] Tagged integers