> Personally, I believe patch reviews might help most at this point: > take some of the old patches, and evaluate them. Find out whether they > do what they say they do, and whether they do it correctly. If they > fix a bug, determine whether what they change really is a bug, and > whether the fix won't break existing code. Also check whether a test > case accompanies the fix. If the patch adds a new feature, determine > whether the feature is desirable, and whether it comes with > documentation and test cases. Put your analysis as a comment in > the patch. Help reviewing patch #914575 (difflib patch to add HTML side by side difference) (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=914575&group_id=5470) would be appreciated. I am in the process of writing the docs and tests but the user interface to the new functionality could use another person's perspective. > > If anyone is in the Chicago area, I would love to buy you a beer and > > pick your brain. I'm just north of you by 90 miles in Milwaukee but don't like beer :-( Regards, Dan Gass
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4