Raymond writes: > I would like change the Context constructor API to [...] > (list only the flags and traps that you want set). +1 > The dictionaries themselves would be made private (allowing them to > be recast as sets if desired). +1 David writes: > The point of this discussion and the patch is that according to the > spec and PEP 327, there *is no* "conversion syntax" signal. > "Conversion syntax" is an exceptional *condition*, which triggers the > "invalid-operation" *signal*. Same for "division impossible", > "division undefined", and "invalid context"; all of these are > conditions tied to the "invalid-operation" signal. Making > ConversionSyntax etc. into signals would be extending the spec. +1 > No name changes are necessary IMO. +2 -- Michael Chermside
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4